March 3, 2025
News
-
-
February 28, 2025
Beyond the Courtroom: Kevin Docherty Attends Complex Commercial Litigation Institute Summit.
-
February 28, 2025
Kevin Docherty was selected as a Maryland power player on The Daily Record 2025 Business Law Power List for his leading practice in commercial litigation.
-
February 28, 2025
BGL was honored to accept the Diversity Award from the Black Law Students Association of the University of Maryland Carey School of Law in recognition of our ongoing efforts in diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging.
-
February 26, 2025
Eve Hill provided legal perspective in The New York Times about possible discrimination against people with disabilities in scientific grants as a result of Trump’s executive order banning DEIA efforts.
-
February 21, 2025
Monica Basche quoted in a Baltimore Sun article about the MD Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services rolling out body-worn cameras for correctional officers: “Any additional oversight is better than the status quo, but body-worn cameras are not a substitute for hiring qualified individuals and training them to respect the constitutional rights of prisoners.”
-
February 20, 2025
Anthony May joined the American Diabetes Association webinar on Diabetes Rights and Public Accommodations as part of the 2025 annual Fighting for Fairness webinar series.
-
February 20, 2025
Beyond the Courtroom: BGL Sponsored NFB of MD State Convention; Monica Basche Attended a Maryland Association for Justice Roundtable and the American Association for Justice Conference, Lauren DiMartino and Anthony May attended and presented at the Federal Bar Association Civil Rights Étouffée Conference, and Andrew Radding Presented at Valencia College.
-
February 14, 2025
Anthony May and Lauren DiMartino presented panels on Essentials of ADA claims and the Vestiges of Redlining during BGL-sponsored 2025 Federal Bar Association Civil Rights Étouffée.
-
February 13, 2025
Supreme Court of Maryland to hear source-of-income discrimination case addressing landlords’ use a minimum income requirement in violation of the HOME Act.